Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Office Clerks, General Salary: Minnesota vs Alaska

Office Clerks, General earn a median of $47,030 in Minnesota and $51,400 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $4,370 (-8.5%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$47,030
Minnesota median
$47,688 after COL
$51,400
Alaska median
$50,215 after COL
-8.5%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-5.0%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $4,370 more per year than Minnesota for office clerks, general, a gap of +8.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,528 of extra purchasing power (+5.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for office clerks, general in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Office Clerks, General

Minnesota

Median salary
$47,030
Mean salary
$48,790
Employment
55,710
Location quotient
1.17
Jobs per 1,000
19.1
COL-adjusted median
$47,688
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Office Clerks, General page for Minnesota →

Office Clerks, General

Alaska

Median salary
$51,400
Mean salary
$52,150
Employment
4,090
Location quotient
0.78
Jobs per 1,000
12.7
COL-adjusted median
$50,215
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Office Clerks, General page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into office clerks, general from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.