Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Office Clerks, General Salary: Vermont vs Colorado

Office Clerks, General earn a median of $47,140 in Vermont and $56,150 in Colorado. That is a nominal gap of $9,010 (-16.0%), with Colorado paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$47,140
Vermont median
$48,123 after COL
$56,150
Colorado median
$54,487 after COL
-16.0%
Nominal gap
Colorado leads
-11.7%
Adjusted gap
Colorado leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Colorado pays $9,010 more per year than Vermont for office clerks, general, a gap of +16.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Colorado still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,364 of extra purchasing power (+11.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for office clerks, general in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Office Clerks, General

Vermont

Median salary
$47,140
Mean salary
$48,410
Employment
5,120
Location quotient
1.03
Jobs per 1,000
16.8
COL-adjusted median
$48,123
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Office Clerks, General page for Vermont →

Office Clerks, General

Colorado

Median salary
$56,150
Mean salary
$58,400
Employment
30,280
Location quotient
0.64
Jobs per 1,000
10.5
COL-adjusted median
$54,487
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Office Clerks, General page for Colorado →

Related pages

Keep digging into office clerks, general from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.