Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Operations Research Analysts Salary: Georgia vs Virginia

Operations Research Analysts earn a median of $73,890 in Georgia and $123,050 in Virginia. That is a nominal gap of $49,160 (-40.0%), with Virginia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$73,890
Georgia median
$76,735 after COL
$123,050
Virginia median
$121,706 after COL
-40.0%
Nominal gap
Virginia leads
-37.0%
Adjusted gap
Virginia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Virginia pays $49,160 more per year than Georgia for operations research analysts, a gap of +40.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Virginia still comes out ahead, with roughly $44,972 of extra purchasing power (+37.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for operations research analysts in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Operations Research Analysts

Georgia

Median salary
$73,890
Mean salary
$81,560
Employment
4,450
Location quotient
1.31
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$76,735
Regional Price Parity
96.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Operations Research Analysts page for Georgia →

Operations Research Analysts

Virginia

Median salary
$123,050
Mean salary
$122,680
Employment
6,320
Location quotient
2.22
Jobs per 1,000
1.6
COL-adjusted median
$121,706
Regional Price Parity
101.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Operations Research Analysts page for Virginia →

Related pages

Keep digging into operations research analysts from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.