Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Optometrists Salary: Washington vs Vermont

Optometrists earn a median of $157,650 in Washington and $156,000 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $1,650 (+1.1%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$157,650
Washington median
$147,319 after COL
$156,000
Vermont median
$159,252 after COL
+1.1%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-7.5%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $1,650 more per year than Vermont for optometrists, a gap of +1.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Vermont actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $11,933 more in national-price-level terms (a +7.5% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for optometrists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Optometrists

Washington

Median salary
$157,650
Mean salary
$159,450
Employment
930
Location quotient
0.97
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$147,319
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Optometrists page for Washington →

Optometrists

Vermont

Median salary
$156,000
Mean salary
$146,710
Employment
100
Location quotient
1.20
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$159,252
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Optometrists page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into optometrists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.