Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Packers And Packagers, Hand Salary: Alabama vs Indiana

Packers And Packagers, Hand earn a median of $27,690 in Alabama and $38,640 in Indiana. That is a nominal gap of $10,950 (-28.3%), with Indiana paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$27,690
Alabama median
$31,174 after COL
$38,640
Indiana median
$41,402 after COL
-28.3%
Nominal gap
Indiana leads
-24.7%
Adjusted gap
Indiana leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Indiana pays $10,950 more per year than Alabama for packers and packagers, hand, a gap of +28.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Indiana still comes out ahead, with roughly $10,228 of extra purchasing power (+24.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for packers and packagers, hand in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Packers And Packagers, Hand

Alabama

Median salary
$27,690
Mean salary
$29,740
Employment
7,150
Location quotient
0.88
Jobs per 1,000
3.4
COL-adjusted median
$31,174
Regional Price Parity
88.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Packers And Packagers, Hand page for Alabama →

Packers And Packagers, Hand

Indiana

Median salary
$38,640
Mean salary
$39,410
Employment
13,390
Location quotient
1.08
Jobs per 1,000
4.2
COL-adjusted median
$41,402
Regional Price Parity
93.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Packers And Packagers, Hand page for Indiana →

Related pages

Keep digging into packers and packagers, hand from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.