Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Packers And Packagers, Hand Salary: Washington vs Vermont

Packers And Packagers, Hand earn a median of $36,340 in Washington and $38,740 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $2,400 (-6.2%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$36,340
Washington median
$33,958 after COL
$38,740
Vermont median
$39,548 after COL
-6.2%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
-14.1%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $2,400 more per year than Washington for packers and packagers, hand, a gap of +6.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vermont still comes out ahead, with roughly $5,589 of extra purchasing power (+14.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for packers and packagers, hand in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Packers And Packagers, Hand

Washington

Median salary
$36,340
Mean salary
$39,400
Employment
15,510
Location quotient
1.12
Jobs per 1,000
4.4
COL-adjusted median
$33,958
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Packers And Packagers, Hand page for Washington →

Packers And Packagers, Hand

Vermont

Median salary
$38,740
Mean salary
$38,860
Employment
750
Location quotient
0.63
Jobs per 1,000
2.5
COL-adjusted median
$39,548
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Packers And Packagers, Hand page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into packers and packagers, hand from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.