Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Parking Attendants Salary: Minnesota vs Washington

Parking Attendants earn a median of $36,180 in Minnesota and $41,200 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $5,020 (-12.2%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$36,180
Minnesota median
$36,686 after COL
$41,200
Washington median
$38,500 after COL
-12.2%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-4.7%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $5,020 more per year than Minnesota for parking attendants, a gap of +12.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,814 of extra purchasing power (+4.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for parking attendants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Parking Attendants

Minnesota

Median salary
$36,180
Mean salary
$36,650
Employment
1,280
Location quotient
0.50
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$36,686
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parking Attendants page for Minnesota →

Parking Attendants

Washington

Median salary
$41,200
Mean salary
$41,700
Employment
2,780
Location quotient
0.90
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$38,500
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parking Attendants page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into parking attendants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.