Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Parking Attendants Salary: North Dakota vs Vermont

Parking Attendants earn a median of $35,530 in North Dakota and $36,870 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $1,340 (-3.6%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$35,530
North Dakota median
$39,940 after COL
$36,870
Vermont median
$37,639 after COL
-3.6%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
+6.1%
Adjusted gap
North Dakota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $1,340 more per year than North Dakota for parking attendants, a gap of +3.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. North Dakota actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,301 more in national-price-level terms (a +6.1% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for parking attendants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Parking Attendants

North Dakota

Median salary
$35,530
Mean salary
$34,330
Employment
130
Location quotient
0.35
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$39,940
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parking Attendants page for North Dakota →

Parking Attendants

Vermont

Median salary
$36,870
Mean salary
$37,490
Employment
110
Location quotient
0.40
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$37,639
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parking Attendants page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into parking attendants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.