Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Parking Enforcement Workers Salary: Maine vs Utah

Parking Enforcement Workers earn a median of $45,670 in Maine and $53,020 in Utah. That is a nominal gap of $7,350 (-13.9%), with Utah paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$45,670
Maine median
$47,058 after COL
$53,020
Utah median
$53,629 after COL
-13.9%
Nominal gap
Utah leads
-12.3%
Adjusted gap
Utah leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Utah pays $7,350 more per year than Maine for parking enforcement workers, a gap of +13.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Utah still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,571 of extra purchasing power (+12.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for parking enforcement workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Parking Enforcement Workers

Maine

Median salary
$45,670
Mean salary
$47,620
Employment
40
Location quotient
1.12
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$47,058
Regional Price Parity
97.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parking Enforcement Workers page for Maine →

Parking Enforcement Workers

Utah

Median salary
$53,020
Mean salary
$49,150
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.53
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$53,629
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parking Enforcement Workers page for Utah →

Related pages

Keep digging into parking enforcement workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.