Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Parts Salespersons Salary: Montana vs North Dakota

Parts Salespersons earn a median of $42,620 in Montana and $52,000 in North Dakota. That is a nominal gap of $9,380 (-18.0%), with North Dakota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$42,620
Montana median
$45,031 after COL
$52,000
North Dakota median
$58,454 after COL
-18.0%
Nominal gap
North Dakota leads
-23.0%
Adjusted gap
North Dakota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, North Dakota pays $9,380 more per year than Montana for parts salespersons, a gap of +18.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, North Dakota still comes out ahead, with roughly $13,422 of extra purchasing power (+23.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for parts salespersons in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Parts Salespersons

Montana

Median salary
$42,620
Mean salary
$44,080
Employment
1,580
Location quotient
1.81
Jobs per 1,000
3.1
COL-adjusted median
$45,031
Regional Price Parity
94.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parts Salespersons page for Montana →

Parts Salespersons

North Dakota

Median salary
$52,000
Mean salary
$53,110
Employment
1,660
Location quotient
2.28
Jobs per 1,000
3.9
COL-adjusted median
$58,454
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parts Salespersons page for North Dakota →

Related pages

Keep digging into parts salespersons from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.