Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Patternmakers, Metal And Plastic Salary: Minnesota vs Massachusetts

Patternmakers, Metal And Plastic earn a median of $66,120 in Minnesota and $63,480 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $2,640 (+4.2%), with Minnesota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$66,120
Minnesota median
$67,045 after COL
$63,480
Massachusetts median
$60,024 after COL
+4.2%
Nominal gap
Minnesota leads
+11.7%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Minnesota pays $2,640 more per year than Massachusetts for patternmakers, metal and plastic, a gap of +4.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Minnesota still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,020 of extra purchasing power (+11.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for patternmakers, metal and plastic in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Patternmakers, Metal And Plastic

Minnesota

Median salary
$66,120
Mean salary
$64,940
Employment
40
Location quotient
1.26
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$67,045
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Patternmakers, Metal And Plastic page for Minnesota →

Patternmakers, Metal And Plastic

Massachusetts

Median salary
$63,480
Mean salary
$63,100
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$60,024
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Patternmakers, Metal And Plastic page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into patternmakers, metal and plastic from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.