Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Pediatricians, General Salary: Vermont vs Mississippi

Pediatricians, General earn a median of $184,450 in Vermont and $236,860 in Mississippi. That is a nominal gap of $52,410 (-22.1%), with Mississippi paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$184,450
Vermont median
$188,295 after COL
$236,860
Mississippi median
$272,400 after COL
-22.1%
Nominal gap
Mississippi leads
-30.9%
Adjusted gap
Mississippi leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Mississippi pays $52,410 more per year than Vermont for pediatricians, general, a gap of +22.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Mississippi still comes out ahead, with roughly $84,105 of extra purchasing power (+30.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for pediatricians, general in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Pediatricians, General

Vermont

Median salary
$184,450
Mean salary
$189,400
Employment
140
Location quotient
1.64
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$188,295
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Pediatricians, General page for Vermont →

Pediatricians, General

Mississippi

Median salary
$236,860
Mean salary
$281,750
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.19
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$272,400
Regional Price Parity
87.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Pediatricians, General page for Mississippi →

Related pages

Keep digging into pediatricians, general from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.