Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Personal Financial Advisors Salary: Nevada vs California

Personal Financial Advisors earn a median of $81,940 in Nevada and $128,650 in California. That is a nominal gap of $46,710 (-36.3%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$81,940
Nevada median
$81,957 after COL
$128,650
California median
$116,194 after COL
-36.3%
Nominal gap
California leads
-29.5%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $46,710 more per year than Nevada for personal financial advisors, a gap of +36.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $34,237 of extra purchasing power (+29.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for personal financial advisors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Personal Financial Advisors

Nevada

Median salary
$81,940
Mean salary
$142,290
Employment
1,430
Location quotient
0.53
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$81,957
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Personal Financial Advisors page for Nevada →

Personal Financial Advisors

California

Median salary
$128,650
Mean salary
$170,480
Employment
34,070
Location quotient
1.08
Jobs per 1,000
1.9
COL-adjusted median
$116,194
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Personal Financial Advisors page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into personal financial advisors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.