Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Petroleum Engineers Salary: Washington vs Utah

Petroleum Engineers earn a median of $129,660 in Washington and $166,580 in Utah. That is a nominal gap of $36,920 (-22.2%), with Utah paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$129,660
Washington median
$121,163 after COL
$166,580
Utah median
$168,494 after COL
-22.2%
Nominal gap
Utah leads
-28.1%
Adjusted gap
Utah leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Utah pays $36,920 more per year than Washington for petroleum engineers, a gap of +22.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Utah still comes out ahead, with roughly $47,331 of extra purchasing power (+28.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for petroleum engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Petroleum Engineers

Washington

Median salary
$129,660
Mean salary
$142,570
Employment
170
Location quotient
0.39
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$121,163
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Petroleum Engineers page for Washington →

Petroleum Engineers

Utah

Median salary
$166,580
Mean salary
$170,420
Employment
380
Location quotient
1.80
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$168,494
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Petroleum Engineers page for Utah →

Related pages

Keep digging into petroleum engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.