Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Pharmacy Aides Salary: Massachusetts vs District of Columbia

Pharmacy Aides earn a median of $37,240 in Massachusetts and $55,590 in District of Columbia. That is a nominal gap of $18,350 (-33.0%), with District of Columbia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$37,240
Massachusetts median
$35,213 after COL
$55,590
District of Columbia median
$50,582 after COL
-33.0%
Nominal gap
District of Columbia leads
-30.4%
Adjusted gap
District of Columbia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, District of Columbia pays $18,350 more per year than Massachusetts for pharmacy aides, a gap of +33.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, District of Columbia still comes out ahead, with roughly $15,369 of extra purchasing power (+30.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for pharmacy aides in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Pharmacy Aides

Massachusetts

Median salary
$37,240
Mean salary
$39,490
Employment
330
Location quotient
0.34
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$35,213
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Pharmacy Aides page for Massachusetts →

Pharmacy Aides

District of Columbia

Median salary
$55,590
Mean salary
$54,040
Employment
80
Location quotient
0.42
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$50,582
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Pharmacy Aides page for District of Columbia →

Related pages

Keep digging into pharmacy aides from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.