Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Photographers Salary: Springfield, IL vs Springfield, MA

Photographers earn a median of $31,180 in Springfield, IL and $64,880 in Springfield, MA. That is a nominal gap of $33,700 (-51.9%), with Springfield, MA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$31,180
Springfield, IL median
$33,619 after COL
$64,880
Springfield, MA median
$67,540 after COL
-51.9%
Nominal gap
Springfield, MA leads
-50.2%
Adjusted gap
Springfield, MA leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Springfield, MA pays $33,700 more per year than Springfield, IL for photographers, a gap of +51.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Springfield, MA still comes out ahead, with roughly $33,921 of extra purchasing power (+50.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for photographers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Photographers

Springfield, IL

Median salary
$31,180
Mean salary
$38,620
Employment
40
Location quotient
1.04
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$33,619
Regional Price Parity
92.7%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Photographers page for Springfield, IL →

Photographers

Springfield, MA

Median salary
$64,880
Mean salary
$64,080
Employment
70
Location quotient
1.07
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$67,540
Regional Price Parity
96.1%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Photographers page for Springfield, MA →

Related pages

Keep digging into photographers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.