Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Physician Assistants Salary: Georgia vs Rhode Island

Physician Assistants earn a median of $109,990 in Georgia and $141,600 in Rhode Island. That is a nominal gap of $31,610 (-22.3%), with Rhode Island paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$109,990
Georgia median
$114,224 after COL
$141,600
Rhode Island median
$138,443 after COL
-22.3%
Nominal gap
Rhode Island leads
-17.5%
Adjusted gap
Rhode Island leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Rhode Island pays $31,610 more per year than Georgia for physician assistants, a gap of +22.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Rhode Island still comes out ahead, with roughly $24,219 of extra purchasing power (+17.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for physician assistants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Physician Assistants

Georgia

Median salary
$109,990
Mean salary
$108,270
Employment
4,400
Location quotient
0.90
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$114,224
Regional Price Parity
96.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physician Assistants page for Georgia →

Physician Assistants

Rhode Island

Median salary
$141,600
Mean salary
$148,290
Employment
600
Location quotient
1.20
Jobs per 1,000
1.2
COL-adjusted median
$138,443
Regional Price Parity
102.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physician Assistants page for Rhode Island →

Related pages

Keep digging into physician assistants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.