Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Physician Assistants Salary: Iowa vs Oregon

Physician Assistants earn a median of $133,400 in Iowa and $149,130 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $15,730 (-10.5%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$133,400
Iowa median
$152,002 after COL
$149,130
Oregon median
$144,281 after COL
-10.5%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
+5.4%
Adjusted gap
Iowa leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $15,730 more per year than Iowa for physician assistants, a gap of +10.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Iowa actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $7,721 more in national-price-level terms (a +5.4% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for physician assistants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Physician Assistants

Iowa

Median salary
$133,400
Mean salary
$135,450
Employment
1,200
Location quotient
0.76
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$152,002
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physician Assistants page for Iowa →

Physician Assistants

Oregon

Median salary
$149,130
Mean salary
$152,160
Employment
1,930
Location quotient
0.97
Jobs per 1,000
1.0
COL-adjusted median
$144,281
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physician Assistants page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into physician assistants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.