Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Physician Assistants Salary: Vermont vs New York

Physician Assistants earn a median of $138,610 in Vermont and $152,650 in New York. That is a nominal gap of $14,040 (-9.2%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$138,610
Vermont median
$141,499 after COL
$152,650
New York median
$141,446 after COL
-9.2%
Nominal gap
New York leads
+0.0%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $14,040 more per year than Vermont for physician assistants, a gap of +9.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Vermont actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $53 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.0% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for physician assistants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Physician Assistants

Vermont

Median salary
$138,610
Mean salary
$141,000
Employment
410
Location quotient
1.32
Jobs per 1,000
1.3
COL-adjusted median
$141,499
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physician Assistants page for Vermont →

Physician Assistants

New York

Median salary
$152,650
Mean salary
$151,280
Employment
19,390
Location quotient
2.01
Jobs per 1,000
2.0
COL-adjusted median
$141,446
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physician Assistants page for New York →

Related pages

Keep digging into physician assistants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.