Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Physics Teachers, Postsecondary Salary: Arizona vs Michigan

Physics Teachers, Postsecondary earn a median of $122,160 in Arizona and $105,790 in Michigan. That is a nominal gap of $16,370 (+15.5%), with Arizona paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$122,160
Arizona median
$121,339 after COL
$105,790
Michigan median
$109,949 after COL
+15.5%
Nominal gap
Arizona leads
+10.4%
Adjusted gap
Arizona leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Arizona pays $16,370 more per year than Michigan for physics teachers, postsecondary, a gap of +15.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Arizona still comes out ahead, with roughly $11,389 of extra purchasing power (+10.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for physics teachers, postsecondary in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Physics Teachers, Postsecondary

Arizona

Median salary
$122,160
Mean salary
$116,930
Employment
170
Location quotient
0.59
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$121,339
Regional Price Parity
100.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physics Teachers, Postsecondary page for Arizona →

Physics Teachers, Postsecondary

Michigan

Median salary
$105,790
Mean salary
$111,870
Employment
440
Location quotient
1.13
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$109,949
Regional Price Parity
96.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physics Teachers, Postsecondary page for Michigan →

Related pages

Keep digging into physics teachers, postsecondary from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.