Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Physics Teachers, Postsecondary Salary: Indiana vs Connecticut

Physics Teachers, Postsecondary earn a median of $101,780 in Indiana and $119,310 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $17,530 (-14.7%), with Connecticut paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$101,780
Indiana median
$109,055 after COL
$119,310
Connecticut median
$115,153 after COL
-14.7%
Nominal gap
Connecticut leads
-5.3%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Connecticut pays $17,530 more per year than Indiana for physics teachers, postsecondary, a gap of +14.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Connecticut still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,098 of extra purchasing power (+5.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for physics teachers, postsecondary in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Physics Teachers, Postsecondary

Indiana

Median salary
$101,780
Mean salary
$106,410
Employment
300
Location quotient
1.08
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$109,055
Regional Price Parity
93.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physics Teachers, Postsecondary page for Indiana →

Physics Teachers, Postsecondary

Connecticut

Median salary
$119,310
Mean salary
$147,970
Employment
230
Location quotient
1.56
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$115,153
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physics Teachers, Postsecondary page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into physics teachers, postsecondary from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.