Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Plant And System Operators, All Other Salary: Texas vs Kentucky

Plant And System Operators, All Other earn a median of $50,470 in Texas and $77,690 in Kentucky. That is a nominal gap of $27,220 (-35.0%), with Kentucky paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$50,470
Texas median
$52,000 after COL
$77,690
Kentucky median
$86,170 after COL
-35.0%
Nominal gap
Kentucky leads
-39.7%
Adjusted gap
Kentucky leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Kentucky pays $27,220 more per year than Texas for plant and system operators, all other, a gap of +35.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Kentucky still comes out ahead, with roughly $34,170 of extra purchasing power (+39.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for plant and system operators, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Plant And System Operators, All Other

Texas

Median salary
$50,470
Mean salary
$57,700
Employment
4,080
Location quotient
2.85
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$52,000
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Plant And System Operators, All Other page for Texas →

Plant And System Operators, All Other

Kentucky

Median salary
$77,690
Mean salary
$74,770
Employment
120
Location quotient
0.58
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$86,170
Regional Price Parity
90.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Plant And System Operators, All Other page for Kentucky →

Related pages

Keep digging into plant and system operators, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.