Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Postal Service Clerks Salary: California vs Michigan

Postal Service Clerks earn a median of $63,670 in California and $63,270 in Michigan. That is a nominal gap of $400 (+0.6%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$63,670
California median
$57,505 after COL
$63,270
Michigan median
$65,758 after COL
+0.6%
Nominal gap
California leads
-12.5%
Adjusted gap
Michigan leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $400 more per year than Michigan for postal service clerks, a gap of +0.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Michigan actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $8,252 more in national-price-level terms (a +12.5% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for postal service clerks in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Postal Service Clerks

California

Median salary
$63,670
Mean salary
$63,420
Employment
6,890
Location quotient
0.75
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$57,505
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Postal Service Clerks page for California →

Postal Service Clerks

Michigan

Median salary
$63,270
Mean salary
$63,070
Employment
2,470
Location quotient
1.11
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$65,758
Regional Price Parity
96.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Postal Service Clerks page for Michigan →

Related pages

Keep digging into postal service clerks from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.