Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Postal Service Mail Carriers Salary: New Mexico vs Texas

Postal Service Mail Carriers earn a median of $55,540 in New Mexico and $58,390 in Texas. That is a nominal gap of $2,850 (-4.9%), with Texas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$55,540
New Mexico median
$60,231 after COL
$58,390
Texas median
$60,161 after COL
-4.9%
Nominal gap
Texas leads
+0.1%
Adjusted gap
New Mexico leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Texas pays $2,850 more per year than New Mexico for postal service mail carriers, a gap of +4.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. New Mexico actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $70 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.1% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for postal service mail carriers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Postal Service Mail Carriers

New Mexico

Median salary
$55,540
Mean salary
$58,880
Employment
1,660
Location quotient
0.89
Jobs per 1,000
1.9
COL-adjusted median
$60,231
Regional Price Parity
92.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Postal Service Mail Carriers page for New Mexico →

Postal Service Mail Carriers

Texas

Median salary
$58,390
Mean salary
$59,740
Employment
27,180
Location quotient
0.90
Jobs per 1,000
2.0
COL-adjusted median
$60,161
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Postal Service Mail Carriers page for Texas →

Related pages

Keep digging into postal service mail carriers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.