Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Printing Press Operators Salary: Jackson, MS vs Napa, CA

Printing Press Operators earn a median of $46,270 in Jackson, MS and $57,010 in Napa, CA. That is a nominal gap of $10,740 (-18.8%), with Napa, CA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$46,270
Jackson, MS median
$51,961 after COL
$57,010
Napa, CA median
$50,651 after COL
-18.8%
Nominal gap
Napa, CA leads
+2.6%
Adjusted gap
Jackson, MS leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Napa, CA pays $10,740 more per year than Jackson, MS for printing press operators, a gap of +18.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Jackson, MS actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,309 more in national-price-level terms (a +2.6% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for printing press operators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Printing Press Operators

Jackson, MS

Median salary
$46,270
Mean salary
$43,490
Employment
250
Location quotient
0.98
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$51,961
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Printing Press Operators page for Jackson, MS →

Printing Press Operators

Napa, CA

Median salary
$57,010
Mean salary
$57,800
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.81
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$50,651
Regional Price Parity
112.6%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Printing Press Operators page for Napa, CA →

Related pages

Keep digging into printing press operators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.