Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Psychiatric Technicians Salary: Massachusetts vs Oregon

Psychiatric Technicians earn a median of $52,290 in Massachusetts and $51,640 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $650 (+1.3%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$52,290
Massachusetts median
$49,444 after COL
$51,640
Oregon median
$49,961 after COL
+1.3%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-1.0%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $650 more per year than Oregon for psychiatric technicians, a gap of +1.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Oregon actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $517 more in national-price-level terms (a +1.0% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for psychiatric technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Psychiatric Technicians

Massachusetts

Median salary
$52,290
Mean salary
$54,900
Employment
3,600
Location quotient
1.12
Jobs per 1,000
1.0
COL-adjusted median
$49,444
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Psychiatric Technicians page for Massachusetts →

Psychiatric Technicians

Oregon

Median salary
$51,640
Mean salary
$53,130
Employment
1,620
Location quotient
0.93
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$49,961
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Psychiatric Technicians page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into psychiatric technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.