Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Psychologists, All Other Salary: Manchester-Nashua, NH vs Fresno, CA

Psychologists, All Other earn a median of $121,780 in Manchester-Nashua, NH and $157,240 in Fresno, CA. That is a nominal gap of $35,460 (-22.6%), with Fresno, CA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$121,780
Manchester-Nashua, NH median
$115,260 after COL
$157,240
Fresno, CA median
$153,918 after COL
-22.6%
Nominal gap
Fresno, CA leads
-25.1%
Adjusted gap
Fresno, CA leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Fresno, CA pays $35,460 more per year than Manchester-Nashua, NH for psychologists, all other, a gap of +22.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Fresno, CA still comes out ahead, with roughly $38,659 of extra purchasing power (+25.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for psychologists, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Psychologists, All Other

Manchester-Nashua, NH

Median salary
$121,780
Mean salary
$102,330
Employment
30
Location quotient
1.44
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$115,260
Regional Price Parity
105.7%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Psychologists, All Other page for Manchester-Nashua, NH →

Psychologists, All Other

Fresno, CA

Median salary
$157,240
Mean salary
$145,900
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.67
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$153,918
Regional Price Parity
102.2%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Psychologists, All Other page for Fresno, CA →

Related pages

Keep digging into psychologists, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.