Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Radiation Therapists Salary: Alabama vs Illinois

Radiation Therapists earn a median of $85,950 in Alabama and $120,360 in Illinois. That is a nominal gap of $34,410 (-28.6%), with Illinois paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$85,950
Alabama median
$96,765 after COL
$120,360
Illinois median
$120,411 after COL
-28.6%
Nominal gap
Illinois leads
-19.6%
Adjusted gap
Illinois leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Illinois pays $34,410 more per year than Alabama for radiation therapists, a gap of +28.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Illinois still comes out ahead, with roughly $23,645 of extra purchasing power (+19.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for radiation therapists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Radiation Therapists

Alabama

Median salary
$85,950
Mean salary
$85,670
Employment
150
Location quotient
0.61
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$96,765
Regional Price Parity
88.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Radiation Therapists page for Alabama →

Radiation Therapists

Illinois

Median salary
$120,360
Mean salary
$111,720
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$120,411
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Radiation Therapists page for Illinois →

Related pages

Keep digging into radiation therapists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.