Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Recreation Workers Salary: Pennsylvania vs California

Recreation Workers earn a median of $34,050 in Pennsylvania and $37,580 in California. That is a nominal gap of $3,530 (-9.4%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$34,050
Pennsylvania median
$34,897 after COL
$37,580
California median
$33,941 after COL
-9.4%
Nominal gap
California leads
+2.8%
Adjusted gap
Pennsylvania leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $3,530 more per year than Pennsylvania for recreation workers, a gap of +9.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Pennsylvania actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $956 more in national-price-level terms (a +2.8% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for recreation workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Recreation Workers

Pennsylvania

Median salary
$34,050
Mean salary
$36,310
Employment
10,540
Location quotient
0.87
Jobs per 1,000
1.8
COL-adjusted median
$34,897
Regional Price Parity
97.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Recreation Workers page for Pennsylvania →

Recreation Workers

California

Median salary
$37,580
Mean salary
$41,830
Employment
48,580
Location quotient
1.34
Jobs per 1,000
2.7
COL-adjusted median
$33,941
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Recreation Workers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into recreation workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.