Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Recreational Therapists Salary: Reading, PA vs Vallejo, CA

Recreational Therapists earn a median of $67,550 in Reading, PA and $102,640 in Vallejo, CA. That is a nominal gap of $35,090 (-34.2%), with Vallejo, CA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$67,550
Reading, PA median
$69,596 after COL
$102,640
Vallejo, CA median
$94,617 after COL
-34.2%
Nominal gap
Vallejo, CA leads
-26.4%
Adjusted gap
Vallejo, CA leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vallejo, CA pays $35,090 more per year than Reading, PA for recreational therapists, a gap of +34.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vallejo, CA still comes out ahead, with roughly $25,021 of extra purchasing power (+26.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for recreational therapists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Recreational Therapists

Reading, PA

Median salary
$67,550
Mean salary
$61,390
Employment
40
Location quotient
2.16
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$69,596
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Recreational Therapists page for Reading, PA →

Recreational Therapists

Vallejo, CA

Median salary
$102,640
Mean salary
$98,690
Employment
30
Location quotient
2.16
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$94,617
Regional Price Parity
108.5%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Recreational Therapists page for Vallejo, CA →

Related pages

Keep digging into recreational therapists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.