Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Registered Nurses Salary: Nebraska vs Washington

Registered Nurses earn a median of $81,020 in Nebraska and $112,180 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $31,160 (-27.8%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$81,020
Nebraska median
$89,919 after COL
$112,180
Washington median
$104,828 after COL
-27.8%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-14.2%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $31,160 more per year than Nebraska for registered nurses, a gap of +27.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $14,909 of extra purchasing power (+14.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for registered nurses in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Registered Nurses

Nebraska

Median salary
$81,020
Mean salary
$82,890
Employment
24,180
Location quotient
1.12
Jobs per 1,000
23.8
COL-adjusted median
$89,919
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Registered Nurses page for Nebraska →

Registered Nurses

Washington

Median salary
$112,180
Mean salary
$115,740
Employment
64,690
Location quotient
0.86
Jobs per 1,000
18.3
COL-adjusted median
$104,828
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Registered Nurses page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into registered nurses from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.