Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Retail Salespersons Salary: Vermont vs Colorado

Retail Salespersons earn a median of $36,810 in Vermont and $36,960 in Colorado. That is a nominal gap of $150 (-0.4%), with Colorado paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$36,810
Vermont median
$37,577 after COL
$36,960
Colorado median
$35,865 after COL
-0.4%
Nominal gap
Colorado leads
+4.8%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Colorado pays $150 more per year than Vermont for retail salespersons, a gap of +0.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Vermont actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,712 more in national-price-level terms (a +4.8% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for retail salespersons in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Retail Salespersons

Vermont

Median salary
$36,810
Mean salary
$41,760
Employment
7,930
Location quotient
1.06
Jobs per 1,000
26.1
COL-adjusted median
$37,577
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Retail Salespersons page for Vermont →

Retail Salespersons

Colorado

Median salary
$36,960
Mean salary
$41,550
Employment
74,640
Location quotient
1.05
Jobs per 1,000
25.8
COL-adjusted median
$35,865
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Retail Salespersons page for Colorado →

Related pages

Keep digging into retail salespersons from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.