Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Rock Splitters, Quarry Salary: Montana vs Oregon

Rock Splitters, Quarry earn a median of $41,660 in Montana and $65,350 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $23,690 (-36.3%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$41,660
Montana median
$44,017 after COL
$65,350
Oregon median
$63,225 after COL
-36.3%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
-30.4%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $23,690 more per year than Montana for rock splitters, quarry, a gap of +36.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Oregon still comes out ahead, with roughly $19,208 of extra purchasing power (+30.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for rock splitters, quarry in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Rock Splitters, Quarry

Montana

Median salary
$41,660
Mean salary
$46,070
Employment
40
Location quotient
4.39
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$44,017
Regional Price Parity
94.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Rock Splitters, Quarry page for Montana →

Rock Splitters, Quarry

Oregon

Median salary
$65,350
Mean salary
$64,150
Employment
60
Location quotient
1.43
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$63,225
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Rock Splitters, Quarry page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into rock splitters, quarry from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.