Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

School Bus Monitors Salary: District of Columbia vs Minnesota

School Bus Monitors earn a median of $36,580 in District of Columbia and $40,000 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $3,420 (-8.6%), with Minnesota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$36,580
District of Columbia median
$33,285 after COL
$40,000
Minnesota median
$40,559 after COL
-8.6%
Nominal gap
Minnesota leads
-17.9%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Minnesota pays $3,420 more per year than District of Columbia for school bus monitors, a gap of +8.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Minnesota still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,275 of extra purchasing power (+17.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for school bus monitors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

School Bus Monitors

District of Columbia

Median salary
$36,580
Mean salary
$37,260
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$33,285
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full School Bus Monitors page for District of Columbia →

School Bus Monitors

Minnesota

Median salary
$40,000
Mean salary
$40,030
Employment
1,110
Location quotient
0.81
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$40,559
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full School Bus Monitors page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into school bus monitors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.