Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

School Bus Monitors Salary: Montana vs Wyoming

School Bus Monitors earn a median of $33,230 in Montana and $38,790 in Wyoming. That is a nominal gap of $5,560 (-14.3%), with Wyoming paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$33,230
Montana median
$35,110 after COL
$38,790
Wyoming median
$41,849 after COL
-14.3%
Nominal gap
Wyoming leads
-16.1%
Adjusted gap
Wyoming leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Wyoming pays $5,560 more per year than Montana for school bus monitors, a gap of +14.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Wyoming still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,739 of extra purchasing power (+16.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for school bus monitors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

School Bus Monitors

Montana

Median salary
$33,230
Mean salary
$34,100
Employment
210
Location quotient
0.87
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$35,110
Regional Price Parity
94.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full School Bus Monitors page for Montana →

School Bus Monitors

Wyoming

Median salary
$38,790
Mean salary
$37,990
Employment
300
Location quotient
2.29
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$41,849
Regional Price Parity
92.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full School Bus Monitors page for Wyoming →

Related pages

Keep digging into school bus monitors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.