Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

School Psychologists Salary: Oregon vs California

School Psychologists earn a median of $113,180 in Oregon and $118,310 in California. That is a nominal gap of $5,130 (-4.3%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$113,180
Oregon median
$109,500 after COL
$118,310
California median
$106,855 after COL
-4.3%
Nominal gap
California leads
+2.5%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $5,130 more per year than Oregon for school psychologists, a gap of +4.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Oregon actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,645 more in national-price-level terms (a +2.5% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for school psychologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

School Psychologists

Oregon

Median salary
$113,180
Mean salary
$106,920
Employment
680
Location quotient
0.84
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$109,500
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full School Psychologists page for Oregon →

School Psychologists

California

Median salary
$118,310
Mean salary
$117,630
Employment
9,350
Location quotient
1.25
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$106,855
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full School Psychologists page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into school psychologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.