Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Self-Enrichment Teachers Salary: Vermont vs New Hampshire

Self-Enrichment Teachers earn a median of $50,960 in Vermont and $59,280 in New Hampshire. That is a nominal gap of $8,320 (-14.0%), with New Hampshire paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$50,960
Vermont median
$52,022 after COL
$59,280
New Hampshire median
$56,910 after COL
-14.0%
Nominal gap
New Hampshire leads
-8.6%
Adjusted gap
New Hampshire leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Hampshire pays $8,320 more per year than Vermont for self-enrichment teachers, a gap of +14.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Hampshire still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,887 of extra purchasing power (+8.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for self-enrichment teachers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Self-Enrichment Teachers

Vermont

Median salary
$50,960
Mean salary
$60,480
Employment
930
Location quotient
1.52
Jobs per 1,000
3.0
COL-adjusted median
$52,022
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Self-Enrichment Teachers page for Vermont →

Self-Enrichment Teachers

New Hampshire

Median salary
$59,280
Mean salary
$60,380
Employment
1,860
Location quotient
1.36
Jobs per 1,000
2.7
COL-adjusted median
$56,910
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Self-Enrichment Teachers page for New Hampshire →

Related pages

Keep digging into self-enrichment teachers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.