Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Service Unit Operators, Oil And Gas Salary: Michigan vs Alaska

Service Unit Operators, Oil And Gas earn a median of $50,300 in Michigan and $98,930 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $48,630 (-49.2%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$50,300
Michigan median
$52,278 after COL
$98,930
Alaska median
$96,650 after COL
-49.2%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-45.9%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $48,630 more per year than Michigan for service unit operators, oil and gas, a gap of +49.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $44,372 of extra purchasing power (+45.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for service unit operators, oil and gas in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Service Unit Operators, Oil And Gas

Michigan

Median salary
$50,300
Mean salary
$54,130
Employment
390
Location quotient
0.31
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$52,278
Regional Price Parity
96.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Service Unit Operators, Oil And Gas page for Michigan →

Service Unit Operators, Oil And Gas

Alaska

Median salary
$98,930
Mean salary
$101,030
Employment
1,290
Location quotient
14.09
Jobs per 1,000
4.0
COL-adjusted median
$96,650
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Service Unit Operators, Oil And Gas page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into service unit operators, oil and gas from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.