Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Ship Engineers Salary: Oregon vs Texas

Ship Engineers earn a median of $87,230 in Oregon and $122,150 in Texas. That is a nominal gap of $34,920 (-28.6%), with Texas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$87,230
Oregon median
$84,394 after COL
$122,150
Texas median
$125,854 after COL
-28.6%
Nominal gap
Texas leads
-32.9%
Adjusted gap
Texas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Texas pays $34,920 more per year than Oregon for ship engineers, a gap of +28.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Texas still comes out ahead, with roughly $41,460 of extra purchasing power (+32.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for ship engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Ship Engineers

Oregon

Median salary
$87,230
Mean salary
$101,230
Employment
110
Location quotient
0.97
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$84,394
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Ship Engineers page for Oregon →

Ship Engineers

Texas

Median salary
$122,150
Mean salary
$121,290
Employment
870
Location quotient
1.12
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$125,854
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Ship Engineers page for Texas →

Related pages

Keep digging into ship engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.