Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Slaughterers And Meat Packers Salary: Minnesota vs Montana

Slaughterers And Meat Packers earn a median of $41,550 in Minnesota and $46,180 in Montana. That is a nominal gap of $4,630 (-10.0%), with Montana paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$41,550
Minnesota median
$42,131 after COL
$46,180
Montana median
$48,793 after COL
-10.0%
Nominal gap
Montana leads
-13.7%
Adjusted gap
Montana leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Montana pays $4,630 more per year than Minnesota for slaughterers and meat packers, a gap of +10.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Montana still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,662 of extra purchasing power (+13.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for slaughterers and meat packers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Slaughterers And Meat Packers

Minnesota

Median salary
$41,550
Mean salary
$42,260
Employment
3,190
Location quotient
2.50
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$42,131
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Slaughterers And Meat Packers page for Minnesota →

Slaughterers And Meat Packers

Montana

Median salary
$46,180
Mean salary
$43,910
Employment
130
Location quotient
0.57
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$48,793
Regional Price Parity
94.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Slaughterers And Meat Packers page for Montana →

Related pages

Keep digging into slaughterers and meat packers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.