Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Social Workers, All Other Salary: Virginia vs Oklahoma

Social Workers, All Other earn a median of $86,690 in Virginia and $100,150 in Oklahoma. That is a nominal gap of $13,460 (-13.4%), with Oklahoma paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$86,690
Virginia median
$85,743 after COL
$100,150
Oklahoma median
$114,010 after COL
-13.4%
Nominal gap
Oklahoma leads
-24.8%
Adjusted gap
Oklahoma leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oklahoma pays $13,460 more per year than Virginia for social workers, all other, a gap of +13.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Oklahoma still comes out ahead, with roughly $28,267 of extra purchasing power (+24.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for social workers, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Social Workers, All Other

Virginia

Median salary
$86,690
Mean salary
$81,620
Employment
1,000
Location quotient
0.58
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$85,743
Regional Price Parity
101.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Social Workers, All Other page for Virginia →

Social Workers, All Other

Oklahoma

Median salary
$100,150
Mean salary
$95,330
Employment
330
Location quotient
0.46
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$114,010
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Social Workers, All Other page for Oklahoma →

Related pages

Keep digging into social workers, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.