Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Sociology Teachers, Postsecondary Salary: Texas vs Michigan

Sociology Teachers, Postsecondary earn a median of $82,920 in Texas and $98,920 in Michigan. That is a nominal gap of $16,000 (-16.2%), with Michigan paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$82,920
Texas median
$85,434 after COL
$98,920
Michigan median
$102,809 after COL
-16.2%
Nominal gap
Michigan leads
-16.9%
Adjusted gap
Michigan leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Michigan pays $16,000 more per year than Texas for sociology teachers, postsecondary, a gap of +16.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Michigan still comes out ahead, with roughly $17,375 of extra purchasing power (+16.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for sociology teachers, postsecondary in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Sociology Teachers, Postsecondary

Texas

Median salary
$82,920
Mean salary
$94,840
Employment
1,120
Location quotient
1.01
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$85,434
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Sociology Teachers, Postsecondary page for Texas →

Sociology Teachers, Postsecondary

Michigan

Median salary
$98,920
Mean salary
$102,010
Employment
410
Location quotient
1.15
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$102,809
Regional Price Parity
96.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Sociology Teachers, Postsecondary page for Michigan →

Related pages

Keep digging into sociology teachers, postsecondary from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.