Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Stockers And Order Fillers Salary: Indiana vs Washington

Stockers And Order Fillers earn a median of $35,510 in Indiana and $42,210 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $6,700 (-15.9%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$35,510
Indiana median
$38,048 after COL
$42,210
Washington median
$39,444 after COL
-15.9%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-3.5%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $6,700 more per year than Indiana for stockers and order fillers, a gap of +15.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,396 of extra purchasing power (+3.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for stockers and order fillers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Stockers And Order Fillers

Indiana

Median salary
$35,510
Mean salary
$37,470
Employment
62,540
Location quotient
1.09
Jobs per 1,000
19.6
COL-adjusted median
$38,048
Regional Price Parity
93.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Stockers And Order Fillers page for Indiana →

Stockers And Order Fillers

Washington

Median salary
$42,210
Mean salary
$44,670
Employment
55,260
Location quotient
0.87
Jobs per 1,000
15.6
COL-adjusted median
$39,444
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Stockers And Order Fillers page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into stockers and order fillers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.