Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Stockers And Order Fillers Salary: Oregon vs Connecticut

Stockers And Order Fillers earn a median of $41,430 in Oregon and $40,010 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $1,420 (+3.5%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$41,430
Oregon median
$40,083 after COL
$40,010
Connecticut median
$38,616 after COL
+3.5%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
+3.8%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $1,420 more per year than Connecticut for stockers and order fillers, a gap of +3.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Oregon still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,467 of extra purchasing power (+3.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for stockers and order fillers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Stockers And Order Fillers

Oregon

Median salary
$41,430
Mean salary
$42,240
Employment
44,740
Location quotient
1.26
Jobs per 1,000
22.8
COL-adjusted median
$40,083
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Stockers And Order Fillers page for Oregon →

Stockers And Order Fillers

Connecticut

Median salary
$40,010
Mean salary
$40,860
Employment
36,140
Location quotient
1.19
Jobs per 1,000
21.5
COL-adjusted median
$38,616
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Stockers And Order Fillers page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into stockers and order fillers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.