Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Stockers And Order Fillers Salary: Wisconsin vs Connecticut

Stockers And Order Fillers earn a median of $34,760 in Wisconsin and $40,010 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $5,250 (-13.1%), with Connecticut paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$34,760
Wisconsin median
$36,941 after COL
$40,010
Connecticut median
$38,616 after COL
-13.1%
Nominal gap
Connecticut leads
-4.3%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Connecticut pays $5,250 more per year than Wisconsin for stockers and order fillers, a gap of +13.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Connecticut still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,675 of extra purchasing power (+4.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for stockers and order fillers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Stockers And Order Fillers

Wisconsin

Median salary
$34,760
Mean salary
$37,110
Employment
45,560
Location quotient
0.86
Jobs per 1,000
15.6
COL-adjusted median
$36,941
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Stockers And Order Fillers page for Wisconsin →

Stockers And Order Fillers

Connecticut

Median salary
$40,010
Mean salary
$40,860
Employment
36,140
Location quotient
1.19
Jobs per 1,000
21.5
COL-adjusted median
$38,616
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Stockers And Order Fillers page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into stockers and order fillers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.