Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Substitute Teachers, Short-Term Salary: Indiana vs Hawaii

Substitute Teachers, Short-Term earn a median of $36,830 in Indiana and $50,070 in Hawaii. That is a nominal gap of $13,240 (-26.4%), with Hawaii paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$36,830
Indiana median
$39,463 after COL
$50,070
Hawaii median
$45,538 after COL
-26.4%
Nominal gap
Hawaii leads
-13.3%
Adjusted gap
Hawaii leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Hawaii pays $13,240 more per year than Indiana for substitute teachers, short-term, a gap of +26.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Hawaii still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,076 of extra purchasing power (+13.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for substitute teachers, short-term in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Substitute Teachers, Short-Term

Indiana

Median salary
$36,830
Mean salary
$40,890
Employment
8,660
Location quotient
0.87
Jobs per 1,000
2.7
COL-adjusted median
$39,463
Regional Price Parity
93.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Substitute Teachers, Short-Term page for Indiana →

Substitute Teachers, Short-Term

Hawaii

Median salary
$50,070
Mean salary
$47,870
Employment
1,970
Location quotient
1.02
Jobs per 1,000
3.2
COL-adjusted median
$45,538
Regional Price Parity
110.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Substitute Teachers, Short-Term page for Hawaii →

Related pages

Keep digging into substitute teachers, short-term from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.