Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Substitute Teachers, Short-Term Salary: Iowa vs California

Substitute Teachers, Short-Term earn a median of $36,850 in Iowa and $57,260 in California. That is a nominal gap of $20,410 (-35.6%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$36,850
Iowa median
$41,989 after COL
$57,260
California median
$51,716 after COL
-35.6%
Nominal gap
California leads
-18.8%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $20,410 more per year than Iowa for substitute teachers, short-term, a gap of +35.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,727 of extra purchasing power (+18.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for substitute teachers, short-term in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Substitute Teachers, Short-Term

Iowa

Median salary
$36,850
Mean salary
$38,440
Employment
6,900
Location quotient
1.41
Jobs per 1,000
4.4
COL-adjusted median
$41,989
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Substitute Teachers, Short-Term page for Iowa →

Substitute Teachers, Short-Term

California

Median salary
$57,260
Mean salary
$60,930
Employment
103,210
Location quotient
1.83
Jobs per 1,000
5.7
COL-adjusted median
$51,716
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Substitute Teachers, Short-Term page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into substitute teachers, short-term from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.