Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Surgical Technologists Salary: Alabama vs Massachusetts

Surgical Technologists earn a median of $48,920 in Alabama and $78,300 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $29,380 (-37.5%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$48,920
Alabama median
$55,076 after COL
$78,300
Massachusetts median
$74,038 after COL
-37.5%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-25.6%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $29,380 more per year than Alabama for surgical technologists, a gap of +37.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Massachusetts still comes out ahead, with roughly $18,962 of extra purchasing power (+25.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for surgical technologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Surgical Technologists

Alabama

Median salary
$48,920
Mean salary
$49,440
Employment
2,610
Location quotient
1.69
Jobs per 1,000
1.2
COL-adjusted median
$55,076
Regional Price Parity
88.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Surgical Technologists page for Alabama →

Surgical Technologists

Massachusetts

Median salary
$78,300
Mean salary
$77,630
Employment
2,240
Location quotient
0.83
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$74,038
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Surgical Technologists page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into surgical technologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.