Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Surveying And Mapping Technicians Salary: Kansas vs Nevada

Surveying And Mapping Technicians earn a median of $49,850 in Kansas and $75,660 in Nevada. That is a nominal gap of $25,810 (-34.1%), with Nevada paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$49,850
Kansas median
$55,347 after COL
$75,660
Nevada median
$75,676 after COL
-34.1%
Nominal gap
Nevada leads
-26.9%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Nevada pays $25,810 more per year than Kansas for surveying and mapping technicians, a gap of +34.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Nevada still comes out ahead, with roughly $20,329 of extra purchasing power (+26.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for surveying and mapping technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Surveying And Mapping Technicians

Kansas

Median salary
$49,850
Mean salary
$55,240
Employment
570
Location quotient
1.09
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$55,347
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Surveying And Mapping Technicians page for Kansas →

Surveying And Mapping Technicians

Nevada

Median salary
$75,660
Mean salary
$74,800
Employment
350
Location quotient
0.63
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$75,676
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Surveying And Mapping Technicians page for Nevada →

Related pages

Keep digging into surveying and mapping technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.