Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Surveying And Mapping Technicians Salary: South Carolina vs Alaska

Surveying And Mapping Technicians earn a median of $43,410 in South Carolina and $73,320 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $29,910 (-40.8%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$43,410
South Carolina median
$46,304 after COL
$73,320
Alaska median
$71,630 after COL
-40.8%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-35.4%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $29,910 more per year than South Carolina for surveying and mapping technicians, a gap of +40.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $25,326 of extra purchasing power (+35.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for surveying and mapping technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Surveying And Mapping Technicians

South Carolina

Median salary
$43,410
Mean salary
$45,180
Employment
1,270
Location quotient
1.52
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$46,304
Regional Price Parity
93.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Surveying And Mapping Technicians page for South Carolina →

Surveying And Mapping Technicians

Alaska

Median salary
$73,320
Mean salary
$72,450
Employment
410
Location quotient
3.47
Jobs per 1,000
1.3
COL-adjusted median
$71,630
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Surveying And Mapping Technicians page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into surveying and mapping technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.